This petition was filed by Sudheer Bhai Rajput alleging that private respondents have constructed shops on land over which a high voltage line of 33kv is passing, which may pose health hazard to the residents of the area.
Supreme Court dismissed plea of man seeking appointment on compassionate grounds in Central Coalfields in place of his deceased stepmother. A two-judge bench heard the plea of step-son Nageshwar Turi claiming the appointment under Social Security Measure
Chief Justice Ramana observed that the Advocates have different opinion on the issue of continuation of virtual court hearing of the cases and that the lawyers have expressed different point of view regarding the decision of the courts to revert to the physical hearing of the cases.
The reply further submits that AIIMS Jodhpur has cardiologists, neurologists, endocrinologist, urologists, orthopedic consultants, and experience Ayurvedacharya are available at Ayurveda University Hospital, Jodhpur and they are capable of treating Asaram effectively.
Attorney General KK Venugopal on Tuesday strongly objected to the judgement passed by the Bombay High Court, which held 'skin-to-skin' contact is necessary to constitute sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that a revenue authority does not have the power to determine the validity of a will while considering an application for mutation.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has observed that the Court cannot decide under PIL jurisdiction as to when a Hindu can execute will or a Muslim can dedicate property to the Waqf.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has disposed of a PIL seeking criminal prosecution against the sarpanch of a gram panchayat, directing the petitioner to approach the Collector of Jabalpur for the same.
The Delhi High Court was informed by lawyer Prashant Bhushan that a petition has been moved by him before the Apex Court challenging the appointment of IPS Officer Rakesh Asthana as the Police Commissioner of Delhi.
The Supreme Court, while hearing an anticipatory bail plea filed by a man accused in a murder case on Tuesday, observed that FIR is not an exhaustive document. If it does not indicate who the conspirators are, it does not mean the FIR is faulty.