Delhi High Court suggests template directions for intermediaries and law enforcement in offences under Sec. 67 of IT Act (Publishing or transmitting Obscene material)
Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, appearing for West Bengal, said the matter is in the ambit of the concurrent list, where both the Centre and the State can legislate. The State law cannot be rendered repugnant to the Centre’s law, until and unless it is in conflict with the same.
Mr Ashok Agarwal appearing for the petitioner put it into the notice of the court that DMD is a recognized form of disability under the rights of persons with disabilities Act, 2016.
The division bench stayed the adverse remarks made against him . The adverse remarks made in a case involving shooter Vishwajit Singh were challenged by Haryana-cadre IAS officer Ashok Khemka.
While putting emphasis on the significance of appointing the Ad-Hoc Judges, the top court said that the strength of permanent and additional judges can be utilized for current and not so old cases.
In an affidavit filed by Centre in Delhi High Court, it said: “In order to ensure a continuous supply of oxygen for medical purposes, the use of oxygen for industrial purposes has been banned except for certain critical industries w.e.f. Apr 22.”
The petition, filed by Our Independent Organisation of People, had sought for a mandamus, directing the respondents to reconsider the implementation of the 11th Pay Commission.