Uttarakhand High Court

Uttarakhand High Court heard a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed  on the ground that the public road in Village Nasirpur Kalan, Tehsil and District Haridwar, is generally submerged under water.

“Merely appointing an Enquiry Officer does not mean that the representation has been allowed, or that appropriate steps have been taken by the State against the erring officers”, observed the Division Bench of Uttarakhand High Court.

The Uttarakhand High Court recently disposed of a PIL filed seeking directions from the authorities to conduct an appropriate inquiry of the mining operations and take action against actual culp...

The Uttarakhand High Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL while observing that the petitioner has a personal dispute with the private respondent which has prompted him to approach the High Court time an...

The Uttarakhand State Disaster Management Authority on Wednesday informed the High Court that the state government has granted Rs 20 crore to the Irrigation Department to take care of the difficulties created by the landslides in Baliyanala area.

The Uttarakhand High Court dismissed a PIL, with a cost of Rs 10,000 on the petitioner, with an observation that in PIL jurisdiction a judgment cannot be quashed. The division bench comprising of ...

The Uttarakhand High Court on Wednesday observed that cosmetic decisions taken by the Chief Secretary in the meeting held on November 12, 2021, would not solve the problem of landslides in Nainital's Baliyanala area.

Uttarakhand High Court division bench heard a PIL which raised a issue that the State has failed to enact any policy or rules with regard to premature release of convicting prisoners, after they have completed 14 years of sentence.

The Uttarakhand High Court has recently directed the Uttarakhand Government to ensure the District Magistrates of Dehradun, Haridwar, Udham Singh Nagar, and Pauri Garhwal should be directed to complete the inquiry into alleged corruption at the state-run Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Board and send their respective inquiry reports to the State Government by December 1.

Uttarakhand High Court on bare perusal of the reliefs prayed by the petitioner held reveal that neither of the first two prayers can be granted by the Court by issuance of the writ of mandamus to the respondents.