Delhi HC to hear matter related to flight crew breath check today

The Delhi High Court will hear today the matter in which it has asked the Director General Medical Services (Air) to consider whether the Breath Analyzer Test (BAT) can be conducted in an open area with mobile electrical connectivity so that the spread of Covid-19 through suspended particles/aerosols in a confined room can be avoided for the safety of the cabin crew, ATCs, and pilots.

The court asked the DGMS (Air) to submit a report by May 10. The Delhi High Court order dated April 27 sought a report from the Medical Committee formed by the DGMS (Air) on the issues related to the continuation of Breath Analyzer Test, to which the committee has commented:

“Related to continuation of Breath Analyzer Test (BA Test) – Keeping in mind the safety of passengers as also the safety of the personnel including the pilots, cabin crew and air traffic controllers, complete suspension of BA Test may prove counterproductive and hence, not advisable.

“Related to Blood Alcohol Test – Conduct of Blood Alcohol Test is invasive and non-practical in view of the specific requirements of Civil Aviation. Further, protocols related to carriage of the samples and protecting the sanctity of samples is an issue, which makes blood tests an unreliable method,” it added.

Anjana Gosain, appearing for Director General Medical Services (Air), submitted that the document, which lays down the compliance protocol of Civil Aviation Requirements with modifications carried out by the DGCA in respect of the number of crew members, cabin crews and ATCs, said, “Ten percent of flight crew member and the cabin crew member shall be subjected to random preflight Breath-Analyzer test for the entire operation of an Organisation of India. The ATCO shall be subject to random Breath Analyzer test before commencement of duty at each station on daily basis.”

The Counsel further submitted that the last order the DGCA, obtained data from various airlines, which revealed that most of the airlines are conducting testing using breath analyzers, which is much higher than 10 percent and in some airlines, even close to 30 percent.

Piyush Sanghi, Counsel appearing for Air Traffic Controllers (ATC) raised an apprehension before the court that the breath analyzer test is conducted in an enclosed space and that the air blown into the equipment is released out in open from the other end by placing reliance upon the judgement of this court in Saurabh Sharma vs Sub-Divisional Magistrate (East) and Ors and studies by various international agencies, including the WHO and LANCET that it is now established that Covid-19 spreads through aerosols and droplets, which are suspended in air.

The court, on May 5, after hearing the counsel for the parties and considering the data, asked the DGMS (Air) to consider the following issues in compliance of its previous order dated April 27:

i) Whether the BAT can be conducted in an open area with mobile electrical connectivity so that the spread of Covid-19 through the suspended particles/aerosols in a confined room can be avoided for the safety of the cabin crew, ATCs and pilots?

ii) Whether the DGMS (Air) approves the percentages mentioned in the order dated April 27 or should the same be random for all categories of employees – ATCs, pilots and cabin crew?

iii) Whether the cabin crew, ATCs and other personnel, who have to undergo the BAT, could be first subjected to a rapid antigen test and thereafter be made to undergo the BAT?

iv) Whether the percentages need to be changed and if so, to what extent.

The court further directed the airlines to strictly abide by the percentage of testing, which are mentioned in the April 27 order issued by the DGCA and accept the said opinion of the Committee that the blood alcohol testing is not possible at this point.

Read Also: Delhi Police issue lookout notice for Navneet Kalra in oxygen concentrators black marketing case

Subsequently, the court emphasized that all staff of the Airlines, including ATCs, cabin crew, and the pilots, would be bound to give the undertakings and the declarations, in respect of having not consumed alcohol in terms of the applicable regulations, failing which, they could be re-rostered and strict action would be liable to be taken against them.