Saturday, November 23, 2024
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Meghalaya High Court dismisses petition pertaining to roster system for reserved seats in the State

The Meghalaya High Court has held that the Judicial notice needs to be taken of the discussions pertaining to the roster in the new Assembly.

The Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice W. Diengdoh dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by one Greneth M. Sangma pertaining to the roster system for reserved seats in the State.

The Court said that the petition appears to be an attempt to muddy the already disturbed waters.

It is noted by the High Court that in the year 2022, quite accidentally in the course of a service matter before a Division Bench of the High Court, that though the reservation policy had been in place in this State since its inception in January, 1972, there was no roster that had been prepared.

Accordingly, the Court took suo motu cognisance of such irregularity and required all appointments to be stayed till a roster was prepared. Certain ancillary directions were also issued. A roster was prepared. The Court noticed that a roster had been prepared and the matter was given a quietus without going into the veracity of the roster that was prepared and upon prima facie satisfaction that the roster adhered to the extent of reservation of about 85 per cent that is in vogue in the State.

The Court observed that it does not appear that any decision has yet been taken as to a cut-off date or the like or how far back the roster system would be made applicable. These are policy matters that are best left to the legislature and the executive and upon a firm stand being taken, it will be open to any citizen affected thereby to question the propriety thereof in accordance with law.

As of now, and without a decision in such regard having been taken by the Assembly which is actively discussing the matter, the present petition should not be entertained , the Court further observed.

Accordingly, the PIL is dismissed without going into the merits of the matter pertaining to the roster system for reserved seats in the State. The Court may be called upon to look into the matter at a more appropriate stage.

spot_img

News Update