The Bombay High Court has disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider providing one compartment with separate entrance for senior citizens in local trains in Mumbai.
Responding to this PIL petition, an affidavit in reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents, wherein it has been stated that decision has been taken to provide one coach in each local train in Mumbai exclusively for use of senior citizens.
It has also been stated in the said affidavit that the same would require modification in 105 rakes over Western Railway and 155 rakes in Central Railway, which will be done without hampering the existing train services and it will take around two years from the date of issue of work order and once the said modification in the rakes is done, the same will be available for senior citizens. The relevant paragraph no. 5(v) of the affidavit in reply is extracted hereinbelow:
“5. Submission
i. …..
ii. …..
iii. …..
iv. …..
v. It is pertinent to mention here that the said modification would require in 105 rakes over Western Railway and 155 rakes over Central Railway, which will be done gradually without hampering the existing train services & it will take around 02 years from the date of issue of work order & once the said modification is done in individual rakes, the same will be available for senior citizens in services by such modified rake/s”.
In view of the aforesaid decision as reflected from the affidavit filed by the respondents, the prayer made in this PIL petition has substantially been granted, however, on a query as to whether work order, as described in paragraph 5(v) of the affidavit in reply filed by the respondents, has been issued or not, no clear answer comes-forth from the Counsel representing the respondents, the Division Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar noted.
In the aforesaid view of the matter, the Court disposed of the PIL petition while putting our appreciation on record regarding the decision taken by the Railways, with, however, a further hope and trust that the work order for modification of the requisite number of rakes shall be issued immediately and the entire work shall be completed within two years from the date such work order is issued.
The Court attention has been drawn by the counsel for the petitioner to paragraph 5 of the circular/letter dated 13th July 2023 issued from the office of Principal Chief Commercial Manager, Central Railway, relevant part of which is extracted hereinbelow: –
“5. Conversion of Luggage compartment, if approved by Board requires minimum one year from the date of LOA. In the mean time, this Railway is of the opinion that middle luggage compartment (6th Coach) may be earmarked for separate compartment (Separate entry/exit) with six seats which will be increased by further seven seats after modification in seating arrangements in a phased manner. The seats which are currently reserved for senior citizens in 14 numbers in two compartments will be released for general passengers, which practically are not accessible and usable by senior citizens due to peak hours crowd.”
It has been informed by the counsel for the petitioner that the senior citizens are not being allowed entry in the luggage compartment (6th coach) in the local trains as per the decision contained in paragraph 5 of the circular/letter dated 13th July 2023.
“It is beyond comprehension as to why, despite taking such decision, the benefit to the senior citizens to travel in the luggage compartments is not being given. We, therefore, direct that if there is no other impediment, the Central Railway managing the local trains in Mumbai shall ensure compliance of the said decision contained in paragraph 5 of the circular/letter dated 13th July 2023,” the order reads.