Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has addressed the controversy surrounding remarks he made during the hearing of a petition concerning the restoration of a damaged idol of Lord Vishnu in the Javari Temple at Khajuraho, Madhya Pradesh. The petition had sought directions from the Supreme Court to restore and reinstall the beheaded idol, which stands about seven feet tall.
A bench comprising CJI Gavai and Justice Vinod Chandran dismissed the plea, observing that issues relating to restoration of protected monuments fall within the jurisdiction of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The Court also expressed that the matter appeared to be in the nature of publicity interest litigation rather than a genuine case requiring judicial intervention.
While rejecting the petition, CJI Gavai made a remark directed at the petitioner, who had described himself as a staunch devotee of Lord Vishnu. The Chief Justice said, “Go and ask the deity itself to do something now. You say you are a staunch devotee of Lord Vishnu, so go and pray now.” Following the hearing, portions of this comment circulated widely on social media and triggered criticism from certain groups, who argued that it was insensitive to Hindu sentiments.
In response, CJI Gavai clarified in open court that his words had been distorted online and reiterated that he holds respect for all religions. He emphasized that the comments were being misinterpreted outside their actual context. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta also supported the Chief Justice, noting that social media often amplifies and twists statements beyond their intent, thereby creating unnecessary controversy. Justice Chandran, who was part of the bench, also acknowledged the challenges of judicial comments being taken out of context in the public domain.
The issue has also drawn attention from the legal fraternity, with Advocate Vineet Jindal submitting a representation highlighting that even if the comments were not part of the official record, their circulation had caused distress among devotees. He urged that judicial discretion should be exercised with caution so as not to hurt religious beliefs, which are safeguarded under the Constitution.