Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL seeking to challenge advertisement issued by government sponsored polytechnic for job

The Calcutta High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking to challenge the advertisement issued by a government sponsored polytechnic college dated 29.12.2022 in so far as relates to two posts, namely, Lecturer (Chemistry) and Lecturer (Computer Science).

According to the petitioner, both the posts are manned by two individuals and there is no vacancy and the impugned notification is illegal. 

It is pointed out by the advocate appearing for the respondent State that the petitioner is not a public interest litigant, but it is a private interest litigation in the sense that he seeks to support some of his colleagues since the petitioner himself is working on part-time basis as the Lab Assistant (Physics).  

The Division Bench of Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam and Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta have gone through the proceedings of the Department of Technical Education dated 19th February, 2020 from which the Bench found that the petitioner herein is working as Lab Assistant (Physics) on part-time basis. Thus, there is a tinge of private interest involved in the petition which would have been enough for the Bench to  dismiss the petition. Nevertheless, the Court  has heard the advocates for the parties.
The Bench proposes to consider the correctness of the claim made by the  petitioner. The earlier recruitment which was made for two of the sanctioned posts, namely, Lecturer in Chemistry and Lecturer in Computer Science and Technology along with other posts was purely on part-time basis on a consolidated remuneration. The said appointment on part-time basis was with the specific condition that the candidate cannot claim any right to regular appointment/absorption in regular post of government service and their engagement shall be terminated on unsatisfactory performance and/or involvement in any unlawful activity with one month notice upon the employer.  
The advocate for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is a chronic absentee.   
However, the Bench need not go into the exact issue because the impugned notification has called for application for filling up the post on purely contractual basis or till filling up the post on full-time regular basis.  
“Thus, we find that the respondents have not committed any illegality in issuing the impugned notice. Therefore, there are no grounds made out by the petitioner to interfere with the impugned notification”, the order reads.