A Delhi court on Wednesday awarded four-year sentence to former Parliamentarian Vijay Darda and his son Devendra Darda in a case related to irregularities in the allocation of a coal block in Chhattisgarh.
Special CBI Judge Sanjay Bansal of the Rouse Avenue District Court further sentenced JLD Yavatmal Energy Pvt Ltd director Manoj Kumar Jayaswal to four-year jail sentence. M/s JLD Yavatmal was fined Rs 50 lakh.
Besides, former coal secretary H.C. Gupta and IAS officers K.S. Kropha and K.C. Samaria were senetnced to three-year imprisonment.
Earlier in July, Special Judge Sanjay Bansal convicted the accused under Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 420 (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property) of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act.
The case was related to allocation of coal blocks advertised in 2006. It was alleged that JLD had concealed various facts in its application form in order to obtain wrongful gain in allocation of the coal block.
As per information, the coal block was allocated to JLD as a result of active collaboration between the office bearers of the company and the officials of the Ministry of Coal (MoC) Gupta, Kropha and Samria.
During the scam period, Gupta was then Coal Secretary and Chairman of the Screening Committee, Kropha was posted as Joint Secretary in the MoC and Member Convener of the Screening Committee.
Samria was also posted in the MoC and the allegation was that all the applications were received in his office and his office supervised the entire process of processing the applications right through the entire process of allocation of coal blocks.
A closure report was filed by CBI in the case on April 15, 2014 stating that there was no material to show commission of any criminal conspiracy of cheating. However, the closure report was rejected by the predecessor judge in November 2014.
The judge said that private parties had committed an offence of cheating and there was active connivance with the officials of the MoC.
The Court held that the accused company did make misrepresentations and dishonestly induced the Government of India.
The Court underlined on the role of the public servants and said that they must be held liable for their actions and even though the guidelines issued by the MoC to govern the allocation of captive coal blocks may not be termed as law under Article 13 of the Constitution, they were binding upon the officers.
The Court added that allocation of coal block to an ineligible company was against public interest and the actions of the three officers conclusively showed that their efforts were to somehow recommend allocation of the coal block in favour of JLD.