The Delhi High Court has restrained an Indian company from infringing the globally recognised “Barbie” trademark, granting interim relief to Mattel, the American toy giant that owns the brand. The order came after the Court found that the unauthorised use of the name “Barbie” by the defendant was likely to mislead consumers and dilute the mark’s distinct identity.
Mattel, which has held the Barbie trademark in India since 1985, argued that the defendant was operating businesses under names such as “Barbie Enterprises,” “Barbie Kitchen,” and “Barbie Catering.” According to Mattel, these uses were clearly designed to ride upon the goodwill of a name that is not only synonymous with its globally famous dolls but is also recognised as a well-known trademark under Indian law. Despite being issued legal notices, the defendant neither responded nor withdrew its trademark applications, which had already been flagged by the Registry as conflicting with Mattel’s prior rights.
Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora observed that Mattel had established a strong prima facie case and that the balance of convenience lay in its favour. The Court held that the defendant’s continued use of “Barbie” could cause irreparable injury to the reputation and distinctiveness of the brand. Consequently, an interim injunction was granted restraining the defendant from using the “Barbie” mark in any form, including in signage, promotional material, websites, or social media handles. The order further required the suspension of domain names incorporating “Barbie” until further directions are issued.
The ruling is significant in reinforcing the protective reach of well-known trademarks in India. Courts have consistently held that iconic brands enjoy protection that transcends the specific categories of goods or services they are registered under. This means that even if the infringing activity is in a different business line—such as catering in this case—the use of a famous name like Barbie can be stopped if it creates an association that could confuse consumers or unfairly exploit the reputation of the established mark.
By granting this injunction, the Delhi High Court has once again underscored the principle that brand equity built over decades cannot be casually appropriated, and that the law will intervene swiftly to prevent dilution of marks that command global recognition.