A Sessions Court of Jammu and Kashmir has granted bail to a person, accused of promoting enmity for his comments at a Janta Darbar that he has no expectations from non-local officers posted in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.
The Calcutta High Court has said that all the authorities are expected to act in accordance with law expeditiously, keeping in mind that the retired employee cannot be deprived of his legitimate retirement benefits.
The bench noted that the National Medical Commission will have to explain everything through an affidavit and adjourned the proceeding for the day. The case is about including medical graduates from China, Russia and other countries by certifying them as doctors after a test
The Supreme Court refused to give any relief to disgruntled sons who have challenged the order of Madras High Court for initiation of contempt proceedings against them as they have not vacated their father’s property.
The petition has been filed by a woman lawyer Tanuja Rajan @ Tanuja Kanthulla and her daughter Preeti Rajan seeking anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in relation to Crime No.192 of 2021 registered against the petitioners for offences, including deterring officials from discharging their duty
It is settled law that once statutory regulator has granted approval, the University ought not to withhold grant of affiliation (Jaya Gokul Educational Trust vs. The Commissioner & Secretary, Higher Education, Kerala & Ors).
The Madras High Court has sought response from the state government on considering persons who have applied to the transgender board to be entitled to receive the cash relief announced by the government, despite not having ration cards. The matter will now be taken up on June 18.
Thereafter, the petitioner highlighted the decision of conducting exam is against the Prime Minister’s statement made on 03.05.2021 wherein NEET-PG exam was postponed for 4 months with an assurance that NEET PG will not be conducted till 31.08.2021 and further following statements-
A Single Bench of Justice Vivek Varma recently said that the matter cannot be dismissed merely because of the reason that it does not mention the date on which the demand notice was served upon the alleged defaulter.