Tuesday, December 24, 2024
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

PMLA case: Supreme Court reserves order on Rana Ayyub plea

The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its order in journalist Rana Ayyub’s plea challenging the jurisdiction of the Ghaziabad court, which commenced proceedings against her in a case registered under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The Bench of Justice V Ramasubramanian and Justice J.B. Pardiwala reserved the order after arguments were concluded today.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had registered a case against Ayyub on the basis of a First Information Report (FIR) registered in September, 2021 at Indirapuram Police Station in Ghaziabad under provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Information Technology Amendment Act and the Black Money Act.

As per the FIR, it was alleged that Rana had illegally acquired funds from the general public in the name of charity by launching fundraiser campaigns on online crowd funding platform Ketto.

It added that the journalist also recieved foreign contributions without registration under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA).

Investigation by ED revealed that Ayyub launched three fundraiser campaigns and collected funds totalling Rs 2.69 crore.

These included:

1. Raising funds for farmers and slum-dwellers.

2. Funds for relief work for Assam, Bihar and Maharashtra;

3. Funds to help those impacted by Covid-19 in India.

As per ED, the funds raised were received in her father and sister’s accounts, and were subsequently transferred to her personal accounts. Further, she allegedly utilised these funds to create a fixed deposit of Rs 50 lakh for herself and transferred another Rs 50 lakh to a new bank account.

The investigation revealed that only Rs 28 lakh were used for relief work, whereas a bank balance of Rs 1.7 crore was attached by the agency on February 4, 2022.

As per the investigation by ED, it was revealed that Ayyub illegally raised Rs 2.69 crore by launching three online campaigns in the name of charity by cheating the general public donors.

These funds were not used for the intended purpose, instead used for creation of assets for herself, added the national agency.

spot_img

News Update