SC allows “whistleblower” Sana to seek police protection; transferred CBI officer says he has evidence against Asthana’s graft

1687
CBI feud: Delhi HC extends status quo order in Rakesh Asthana’s plea till Nov 1

Transferred to Port Blair by interim CBI chief, AK Bassi moves Supreme Court challenging order, also wants to testify against Asthana in graft cases

Controversial Hyderabad-based businessman, Sathish Babu Sana, whose claim of having paid Rs 3 crore in bribe to CBI special director Rakesh Asthana plunged the premier investigation agency into chaos last week, has been allowed by the Supreme Court to seek police protection.

Sana, now being referred to as whistleblower in the graft case linking Asthana to meat exporter Moin Qureshi, had moved the apex court, on Tuesday (October 30), claiming that there was a threat to his life. In his petition, filed by advocate K Parameshwar and argued by senior advocate Raju Ramachandran before a bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Sana has said that while he is willing to cooperate with the CBI’s ongoing probe against Asthana, he fears that he will be intimidated and threatened by the probe agency to withdraw/modify his statements already made against the special director, who is currently on leave as per government orders.

It may be noted that Sana’s claim of having paid Rs 3 crore in bribe to Asthana to have his name cleared from a corruption case linked to Qureshi was the basis of the unprecedented FIR registered by the CBI against its controversial special director. The FIR became the flashpoint in the continuing feud between Asthana and CBI chief Alok Verma with the latter urging the Prime Minister to grant sanction to prosecute the special director. The government reacted to the trading of charges between Verma and Asthana by sending both officers on leave, divesting them of all responsibilities and appointing M Nageswara Rao as the agency’s interim director. Verma has challenged the government’s decision in the Supreme Court.

On Tuesday, while the top court allowed Sana to seek police protection, it declined to grant a stay on the notice issued by the CBI to the businessman asking him to appear before it for questioning in the cases linked to Sana.

In related developments, CBI officer AK Bassi who was heading the probe in six corruption cases against Asthana and was transferred to Port Blair by interim chief Rao last week has also approached the CBI challenging the transfer orders. It may be recalled that Bassi along with all other officers probing Asthana were transferred out of Delhi by Rao hours after he took over as the interim CBI chief. Rao had replaced these officers with CBI sleuths who are perceived to be close to Asthana. The Supreme Court had later, while hearing Verma’s petition, restrained Rao from taking any policy decisions till the next date of hearing in the plea moved by the CBI chief which is scheduled for November 25.

The Supreme Court declined to hear Bassi’s petition on Tuesday stating that it did not require an urgent hearing. However, the CBI officer has informed the top court that he has “incriminating evidence” against Asthana in six graft cases and pleaded that the court must call for “evidence of technical surveillance” already carried out against the special director.

— India Legal Bureau