SC notice to Centre, 6 States and BJP for violation of advertisement guidelines

1100
SC notice to Centre, 6 States and BJP for violation of advertisement guidelines

Supreme Court grants Centre, BJP, governments of UP, MP, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Telangana 4 weeks to respond to plea by AAP MLA Sanjeev Jha

The Supreme Court, on Friday (August 31), sought responses from the Centre, six state governments and the BJP on a plea filed by Aam Aadmi Party legislator Sanjeev Jha which alleges gross violation of the apex court’s guidelines of issuance of public advertisements.

The States which have been issued notices are Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh (all ruled by the BJP) and Telangana.

A bench headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi has directed these governments and the BJP to file their responses within four weeks.

Jha has alleged in his petition that the Centre, BJP and respective state governments have issued public advertisements in violation of the apex court’s directions given earlier. He has also sought fresh directions from the Supreme Court to the Centre for constituting a committee that would cognizance of these alleged violations and initiate appropriate proceedings.

It may be recalled that on May 13, 2015, the apex court had passed a slew of directions including the order asking Centre to constitute a three-member committee “consisting of persons with unimpeachable neutrality and impartiality” to regulate the issue of public advertisements at the central and state level.

Later, on March 18, 2016, the apex court modified its order and said the pictures of Union Ministers, Chief Ministers, Governors and State Ministers can appear in government advertisements after the Centre and several States sought a review of the original judgment that had barring publication of leaders’ photos in advertisements. The original order had only allowed photographs of the President, Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India on public advertisements, a directive that the Centre and States wanted relaxed.

—India Legal Bureau, with inputs from PTI