The Supreme Court sought information from the Central government on whether the latter was mulling to introduce a new Bail Law as per the recommendation made by the Apex Court in its 2022 ruling in the case Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation.
The Bench of Justice MM Sundresh and Justice SVN Bhatti directed the Centre recently to inform the Court as to whether any Bail Law was in contemplation or under preparation
The Union of India was further asked to apprise the Court whether any assessment has been done to ascertain the requirement of creating further Special Courts (CBI) in districts with high pendency of cases, with requisite data.
It also asked information on whether the investigative agencies (other than CBI) under its ambit were following the directions laid down in the Satender Kumar Antil order to avoid unnecessary arrests.
It further sought affidavits of compliance from the States and the High Courts regarding the directions issued in its previous order.
On July 11, 2022, the Bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul (since retired) and Justice MM Sundresh had suggested the Union Government to introduce a special enactment in the nature of an ‘Act’ to streamline the grant of bail.
The Apex Court had issued a some guidelines in this direction, which are as follows :
a) The Government of India may consider the introduction of a separate enactment in the nature of a Bail Act so as to streamline the grant of bails.
b) The investigating agencies and their officers are duty-bound to comply with the mandate of Section 41 and 41A of the Code and the directions issued by this Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra). Any dereliction on their part has to be brought to the notice of the higher authorities by the court.
c) The courts will have to satisfy themselves on the compliance of Section 41 and 41A of the Code. Any non-compliance would entitle the accused for grant of bail.
d) All the State Governments and the Union Territories are directed to facilitate standing orders for the procedure to be followed under Section 41 and 41A of the Code while taking note of the order of the High Court of Delhi dated 07.02.2018 in Writ Petition (C) No. 7608 of 2018 and the standing order issued by the Delhi Police i.e. Standing Order No. 109 of 2020, to comply with the mandate of Section 41A of the Code.
e) There need not be any insistence of a bail application while considering the application under Section 88, 170, 204 and 209 of the Code.
f)There needs to be a strict compliance of the mandate laid down in the judgment of this court in Siddharth(in which it was held that the investigating officer need not arrest each and every accused at the time of filing charge sheet).
g) The State and Central Governments will have to comply with the directions issued by this Court from time to time with respect to constitution of special courts. The High Court in consultation with the State Governments will have to undertake an exercise on the need for the special courts. The vacancies in the position of Presiding Officers of the special courts will have to be filled up expeditiously.
h) The High Courts are directed to undertake the exercise of finding out the undertrial prisoners who are not able to comply with the bail conditions. After doing so, appropriate action will have to be taken in light of Section 440 of the Code, facilitating the release.i) While insisting upon sureties the mandate of Section 440 of the Code has to be kept in mind.
j) An exercise will have to be done in a similar manner to comply with the mandate of Section 436A of the Code both at the district judiciary level and the High Court as earlier directed by this Court in Bhim Singh (supra), followed by appropriate orders.
k) Bail applications ought to be disposed of within a period of two weeks except if the provisions mandate otherwise, with the exception being an intervening application. Applications for anticipatory bail are expected to be disposed of within a period of six weeks with the exception of any intervening application.
l) All State Governments, Union Territories and High Courts are directed to file affidavits/ status reports within a period of four months.