 pass judgement on a clutch of petitions seeking a court-monitored probe into the Rafale fighter jet deal between India and France for the Rafale fighter jets.){kind=link}
The Supreme Court will on Friday (December 14) pass judgement on a clutch of petitions seeking a court-monitored probe into the Rafale fighter jet deal between India and France.
The court had on Nov 14 reserved its order into the demand for the probe into the deal for the purchase of 36 Rafale fighter jets after a hearing that stretched for hours .. At the hearing , that began shortly after 10.30 in the morning and stretched well into late afternoon, senior officials of the Indian Air Force were also summoned as witnesses.
On Monday, the government had submitted details of how it decided to buy 36 fighter jets from French defence manufacturer Dassault at Rs. 59,000 crore, to the top court and petitioners who have asked for an investigation into the deal.The pricing details, which the centre said were classified, were also submitted in a sealed cover to the court.
During the last hearing, the government through its top law officer Attorney General KK Venugopal even questioned the court’s competence to judicially review the aircraft deal deal and said it was for experts tgo deal with it. masked the centre’s top law officer while the Supreme Court heard a bunch of petitions demanding a probe into the fighter jet deal with France, and added that the “matter is for experts to decide on, not the court”.After the bench asked for assistance, senior IAF officials were brought in to answer questions. They told the court that Sukhoi 30s were the latest to be inducted which is a third generation aircraft and added that they do not have fourth or fifth generation aircraft in its fleet.The top court asked if there has been no induction of aircraft since 1985, the officers said “no” At that point, the AG told the court that if “rafale had been during the Kargil war, we could have avoided huge casualties as the fighter jet is capable of hitting targets from 60 km.
After hearing THE officers, the Chief Justice allowed them to leave saying, “it is a different war game here in the court. You can go back to your war rooms.”
The Modi government has denied most of the charges and also said it cannot disclose pricing details publicly on account of a secrecy clause in its agreement with France and to ensure India’s enemies do not get to know details of the India-specific enhancements and weaponry of the Rafale.It had given in a sealed envelope pricing details etc to the Supreme Court, though, and the court said it would not get into the pricing issue.
“We are yet to take a call on whether it (cost) should be brought in public domain,” Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi had told attorney general KK Venugopal in the November hearing.
The government has also explained the process followed in an affidavit filed to the court, which has also been shared with the petitioners.
–India Legal Bureau