Thursday, December 26, 2024
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Patna High Court dismisses PIL alleging Bodhgaya Temple Management Commitee of carrying illegal construction

The Patna High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed alleging that the Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee is carrying out an illegal construction within the 100 meters radius of the World Heritage Site declared by the UNESCO in the year 2001; a protected monument and an archaeological site.

It is also alleged in the PIL that the construction is made in complete violation of the provisions of the Bihar Building Bye-Laws, 2014 and the Bihar Municipal Act, 2007. It is further alleged that the construction is without the sanction from the Bodhgaya Nagar Parishad.

The Petitioner is before the High Court second time. The earlier petition was disposed of by judgment wherein the relief extracted is the very same relief sought for in the present petition. The Division Bench on the earlier occasion found that the petition is bereft of any material particulars and there is only a bald allegation that the Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee is making a construction in and around the Bodhgaya Temple.

The petition was disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to take up the matter before the appropriate authority. The petitioner in the present writ petition submits that he had taken up the matter by way of a representation produced before the 4th respondent (The District Magistrate Gaya Cum Chairman Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee, Bodhgaya Gaya) . The 7th respondent (Executive Officer Nagar Parishad Bodhgaya Gaya) had requested the 6th respondent (The Secretary Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee, Bodhgaya) to provide a sanctioned map of the Bodhgaya Temple which was supplied. Nothing further was done in the matter of contention.

It is trite law that there cannot be repeated petitions filed for the very same relief before the High Court; even when it is in public interest, especially by the very same petitioner. Furthermore, the present writ petition suffers from the very same defects pointed out in judgment. The petitioner in the memorandum has waxed eloquent about the history of the temple, but however, it is bereft of any material particulars, as to the construction or the violations alleged. Specific reference has been made to the violation of the provisions of the Bye-Laws of 2014 and the Act of 2007; but no specific provision is pointed out , the Division Bench of Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Partha Sarthy observed.

“Even the declaration of the temple as a protected monument and archaeological site is not substantiated by any material. Neither the Archaeological Department which has declared the site to be a protected monument nor the Nagar Parishad; who it is alleged has not issued sanction, also has not been impleaded. But for the mere assertion that the construction is illegal there is absolutely nothing pleaded or produced before this Court to entertain the writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation”, the order reads.

spot_img

News Update