Mohammed Zubair has prayed that these FIRs be clubbed with the one filed first regarding his 2018 tweet and also challenged the constitution of the Special Investigation Team (SIT), which was formed by the Uttar Pradesh government to investigate his case.
In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC, the High Court had exceeded its jurisdiction, The bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and J.B. Pardiwala observed on Wednesday.
Mishra was initially appointed as the ED Director in November 2018 for a period of 2 years which was schedule to end in November 2020. He had already reached the retirement age of 60 years in May 2020.
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday, while stressing on the importance of the matter related to a petition seeking to declare that PM CARES Fund as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution, directed ...
Supreme Court directs Maharashtra Speaker not to take any action on disqualification matter for the time being… Said constitution of bench will be required and listing will take some time
Vijay Ma...
A Lakhimpur district court on Monday remanded AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair to 14 days judicial custody in a case filed against him by a local journalist for promoting enmity among groups.
Th...
The bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case under Sections 363, 406, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station - Ecotech - 3, District - Gautam Budh Nagar with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The bail plea filed by Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader and former Maharashtra Home Minister Anil Deshmukh in a corruption case was dismissed by a Mumbai court on Monday.
Special Judge ...
Allahabad High Court division bench while hearing a PIL filed by Vinod Kumar Garg dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea seeking a direction to the State Government to enhance the age of superannuation of the employees of the State of U.P from 60 years to 62 years.
Having heard counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, Calcutta High Court division bench noted that counsel for the petitioner could not point out that the candidates have fundamental right to demand the question papers in a particular language.