The order on national anthem is “an interim measure”. The case is listed for hearing on 14th February 2017
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
The facts of the case in which Supreme Court justices Dip...
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
For the first time in his two-and-a-half-years as prime minister, Narendra Modi—who has been using the social media, television and radio to air his thoughts and views and...
The Big, Bad Pollution Haze in Delhi and NCR left millions with a choked feeling, watery eyes or seriously sick. When will the laws be implemented and the guilty punished?
By Ramesh Menon
It is your...
A recent Madras High Court’s directive to YouTube and Google to provide the IP address and details of a user uploading defamatory content has rattled online activists in Tamil Nadu
By R R...
Voluntary Health Association of Punjab versus Union of India decided on 8th November, 2016
By Robin David
The Supreme Court (Justice Dipak Misra and Justice Shiva Kirti Singh) in its judgment da...
In a significant judgment, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court has held that a public official or body cannot disclose information which was obtained on condition of confidentiality. It said, “An imper...
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
Supreme Court judge Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar, delivering the judgment on the behalf of the division bench, the other judge being Justice SA Bobde, on October 26, 2016,...
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
In the Commissioner of Commercial Tax UP vs M/S Oswal Greentech Limited, delivered by the bench of Justice Dipak Mishra and Justice Shiva Kriti Singh, on October 28, 2016...
Kapil Sibal says that “seminal” issues are at stake in the interpretation of Section 123 (3)
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
In the ongoing arguments before the seven-judge Constitution Bench of the S...
Counsel Shyam Divan says that 123 (3) of the Representation of the People Act refers only to the religion of the candidates
Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr
The seven-judge Constitution Bench led by Ch...