A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court while hearing a Criminal Appeal filed by Krishnakant acquitted the accused who was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment and fine under the misdemeanor POCSO Act and SC/ST Act in Kamasin police station area of Banda district.
A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court while hearing an Application under section 482 filed by Suresh Kumar Tanwar and Another has initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against a litigant for filing forged documents.
A single-judge bench of Allahabad high Court while hearing a Criminal Revision filed by Ambika Singh observed that a finding of acquittal recorded by the subordinate court cannot be converted into conviction by High Court in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction under section 401 (3) CrPC.
Allahabad High Court while hearing the petition filed by Vaishali Dwivedi observed that once the Commission is not at fault and action of Commission is not arbitrary, there is no occasion for the High Court to interfere in such matter by permitting the candidate to appear in the Main Examination.
Allahabad High Court while hearing an application under section 482 dismissed the application and observed that the offenses alleged to have been committed by applicants are crimes against society and it can not be said that the dispute is private in nature and does not affect the society at large.
A single-judge bench of Allahabad High Court while hearing an Application under section 482 filed by Sallahuddin while dismissing an application observed that after filing of charge sheet and cognizance by magistrate application for default bail under Section 167(2)(a) CrPC is not maintainable.
The Allahabad High Court while hearing an Application under section 482 filed by Smt Shiela Gupta observed that only on the ground that there was a delay in lodging of first information report, entire criminal proceedings could not be set aside ignoring the contents of FIR and investigation thereof.
Allahabad High Court while hearing a Special Appeal filed by Gaya Prasad Yadav observed that after the retirement of a government servant, if such employee is found to be guilty of grave misconduct it is the Governor who can take action as provided in Article 351-A of the Civil Service Regulations.