Binny Yadav

In a game-changing ruling, the apex court has recognised companies as “victims” under criminal law—granting them the right to independently appeal acquittals, a move that redefines justice for the corporate world

In India’s overcrowded courtrooms, justice is often not denied—it is simply delayed. With over 5.2 crore cases pending across the country’s judiciary, legal redress has become a long and costly ordeal. But what if the government itself—a party to nearly half of all these cases—could step back, streamline, and stop unnecessary litigation?

Years after years and governments after governments, what remains consistent in capital Delhi is its choked and unbreathable air. People suffer not only because of toxic fumes, but also because of the chronic failure of political will

In a child-centric ruling with wide legal and moral implications, the Bombay High Court affirms that legal guardianship must be treated at par with biological or adoptive parenthood—especially in matters of institutional access and rights

A sharp rebuke from the apex court has thrown light on an uncomfortable truth—India’s legal profession may be losing its foundational training ground

Two rulings by MP and Chhattisgarh High Courts have once again exposed the disturbing legal reality in India—that marriage remains a sanctuary for sexual violence and consent still ends at the altar

A recent judgement has reaffirmed maternity leave as a fundamental right under the Constitution, even for third childbirths and contractual workers—shining a harsh light on the chasm between law and lived reality for working women in India

By Binny Yadav In a l...

In a landmark judgment that embraces the evolving dynamics of relationships in India, long-term live-in partnerships cannot be reduced to false promises of marriage 

In a landmark 4:1 verdict, the apex court expands judicial power to “modify” arbitral awards—raising hopes of correcting injustice, but also fears of diluting the core principles of arbitration: finality, autonomy, and minimal court interference