The petition in Delhi High Court is preferred by the Department of Excise and challenges the order of 28 June 2019 passed by the Financial Commissioner. The order restores the excise license which was granted to the respondent setting aside the order of 18 January 2018 which has cancelled the same.
The Delhi High Court has opined that the offence under Section 33 of the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, which has been alleged against the petitioner, is not made out from the facts and circumstances of the instant case, and that the quantity of liquor that has been seized from the residence of the petitioner, falls within the maximum permissible limit specified under Rule 20 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010.
N.P Singh, representing the petitioner in Delhi High Court, submitted that by circular, the Government extended all other licences till November 16, while the private retail liquor licences have been extended only till September 30 that is arbitrary, in violation of provisions of Delhi Excise Act, 2009.
The Delhi High Court will hear on Friday multiple pleas challenging the AAP Government’s decision to levy a special Corona Fee to the extent of 70 percent of the maximum retail price on all categories of liquor.