The Delhi High Court has refused to consider a plea seeking to abolish the provision of tax on the interest of compensation to the person injured in a road accident.
TechFins to enter or operate into the financial sector without establishing registered offices within the territory of India and without prior registration/approval from financial regulators in India.
The petition today was listed before the bench of Chief Justice DN Patel & Justice Prateek Jalan. The Court orders that the present plea should be treated as a representation in accordance with law.
The Delhi High Court has sought a reply from the Delhi Police on the plea of Devangana Kalita, a JNU student and activist of the Pinjara Tod Activist. Kalita, who is accused of rioting in northeast Delhi in February 2020, has asked for a copy of the video of the protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
The division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan heard the petition filed by the Anti-Corruption Council of India Trust on Monday but the matter was adjourned to December 9 due to lack of time.
The petition was listed for hearing on Monday before a bench of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Hrishikesh Roy. The bench has listed the matter for December 14.
While hearing a PIL, a bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan had also asked the Center what steps have been taken on the issue brought to the notice of the government in September this year
The Delhi High Court today reserves its order in BJP leader Manoj Tiwari's challenge to summoning order in criminal defamation case by Manish Sisodia against him. The Order to be pronounced on December 17. The Delhi High Court requests the trial court to defer the hearing till then.
The court said that despite more than 60 days after the accused was arrested in this case, the charge sheet was not filed, hence the accused is entitled to default bail.
According to the High Court, ED's plea for revoking the approver status was not maintainable as statement under Section 306 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) that requires recording of the statement of an accomplice who has been granted a pardon, had not been recorded.