The Himachal Pradesh High Court observed that the Counsel appearing for the petitioner made a statement before the National Lok Adalat that as the state was intending to withdraw the appeal filed by it, the petitioner be also permitted to withdraw the cross objections filed by him.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has observed that a victim of a sexual offence cannot have any locus standi to approach the Court for quashing of FIR registered for the sexual assault, which she had faced.
Taking note of provisions in the National Model Prison Manual and UN Rules, a merciful Himachal Pradesh High Court granted bail to a pregnant woman accused in a drugs-related case.
In such circumstances, the bench failed to appreciate as to how the plan/map submitted by the petitioners for reconstruction/carrying out major repair work of the building for commercial purpose could have been rejected.
The Apex Court Bench observed this act to be well planned murder. Vinay Kumar, advocate for the Petitioner Naresh argued that in the testimonies of witnesses , the role of Naresh has not been ascribed in the alleged crime.
A Single Bench of Justice Ravi Malimath while considering the petition takes into account the fact that an adequate medical facility is available at Kullu as submitted by the Respondent Counsel.
The Court has perused a series of Judgment passed by the Supreme Court, which had held that in intermediate quantity, the rigours of the provision of Section 37 of the NDPS Act may not apply.
The judge, who hails from Haryana, is scheduled to become Chief Justice on November 24, 2025, after his predecessors Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, and Justice BR Gavai.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has recently said that an employee is not only expected but is “bound to follow any lawful command of his superiors and in case an employee is aggrieved by any order/direction of his superior, he has to opt a legal and proper course against such order/direction.