Jammu and Kashmir HC

Entry of litigants and public into the Court premises from the very outer gate shall continue to be prohibited.

Amrit Sarin, counsel appearing for insurance company, contended that the appellant is a government employee and cannot be considered to be an agriculturist and also that the appellant has led no evidence to the loss caused to the motorcycle.

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court has held that non-communication of the fact that the detenu has a right to make an effective representation to the Detaining Authority against the detention order so long as the order of detention has not been approved by the Government constitutes a violation of the valuable right of the detenu under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.