Karnataka High Court have perused the record and observed that in ‘PEOPLE’S UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES vs UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS’ (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.196/2001), the Supreme Court directed that freshly cooked meals be provided to children in all the Government schools across the country.
The Court can interfere with the policy decision only when it suffers from manifest illegality or is shown to be per se arbitrary. The challenge to the policy decision must be made before the execution of the project, observed the Bench.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed a PIL seeking cancellation of the allotments of land made in favour of the Director of inter University centre for Yogi Sciences and Vice Chancellor of Central University of Karnataka (Respondent No.11) in Pantharpalya Village within Bangalore University.
Karnataka High Court bench observed that none of the local fishermen who are said to have been aggrieved or affected by the official memorandum have approached the High Court.
While considering the PIL Karnataka High Court division bench noted that the petitioner has been arrested in the month of April 2022 and is the main accused in connection with the offence registered pertaining to recruitment of Police Sub-Inspectors.
Google India submitted before a bench of Justice Yashwant Varma that this right has various shapes and shades and therefore passing of protective orders would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.