The division bench of Justices S.V. Bhatti and Murali Purushothaman passed this judgment while hearing a petition which claimed to have been filed to protect the interests/rights of the people of Lakshadweep, a Union Territory, from the ulterior motive of destroying the traditional life and culture.
Aisha Sultana was seeking pre-arrest bail in the FIR registered by Kavaratti Police under Section 124A (sedition) and 153B (acts against national integration) of IPC on the basis of a petition lodged by the BJP’s Lakshadweep unit president C Abdul Khadar Haji.
On May 19, the High Court after considering the emergent situation which has arisen due to Covid second wave and the consequent lockdown by the state govt has passed various directions by also taking into account the restoration of the orders passed by the apex court on 07/05/2021, in view of the same.
Delhi High Court grants bail to Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal and Asif Iqbal Tanha in Delhi riots case … said the case has no merit … Court has said that demonstration against the government is not terrorism … democracy by suppression of protest will be in danger
Mr Achuthanandan claimed the allegations in his complaint and the FIR were different. He also said that the complaint should not have been rejected without conducting preliminary enquiry.
The judgments of trial court are challenged mainly on the ground that the procedure adopted by the trial court in finding the accused to have pleaded guilty was patently illegal.
N.K.Subramanian, counsel for the appellant, submitted that the wife was suffering from an incurable unsoundness of mind and mental disorder prior to marriage and consent to marriage was obtained by suppressing the fact.
The Kerala High Court has quashed the orders of the Kerala Government announcing scholarship to Muslim students and Latin Catholic/Converted Christians in the ratio 80:20 and directed the Kerala Government to pass appropriate Government orders providing merit-cum-means scholarship