Monday, April 28, 2025
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

TAG

NCLAT

Tata-Mistry case: Supreme...

Supreme Court to hear former Tata Sons chairman Cyrus Mistry's review petition on March 9, against its March 2021 verdict, which supported Tata Sons decision to remove Mistry as chairman.

Welcome Move

The former Supreme Court judge has taken over as the chairperson of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. He had retired from the Supreme Court this July. His vast experience and “welfarist and humanist” approach will be much needed at the tribunal. Earlier this year, APN channel.....

Rajasthan High Court stay...

A single-judge bench of Supreme Court stayed an arrest warrant issued against Alok Dhir in relation to the State Bank of India (SBI) loan scam while hearing a petition filed by him and others.

Delhi High Court dismisse...

The Delhi High Court on ...

Former SC judge Ashok Bhu...

The Central Government o...

Judicial Member Bhaskara ...

Judicial Member Bhaskara Pantula Mohan shall take over as Acting President of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on Thursday June 10, 2021, for a period of three months or till joining of New President or till further orders whichever is earliest.

Supreme Court wants Centr...

On the previous date of hearing, Balbir Singh, Additional Solicitor General, had submitted that the process for appointment of candidates who have been selected pursuant to the procedure which was initiated in 2019 shall be expedited and orders of appointment shall be issued soon.

NCLAT reply to Supreme Co...

The defaulting Licensees/ TelCos cannot be permitted to wriggle out of their liabilities by resorting to triggering of CIRP by seeking initiation of CIRP under Section 10 of I&B Code

Delhi HC: NCLT, NCLAT may...

The Delhi High Court on Monday directed that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)

Supreme Court issues noti...

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice in an appeal against the NCLAT order which had held that entries in the balance sheet of the company do not constitute an acknowledgement of liability in terms of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

News Update

- Advertisement -