A petition filed in the Supreme Court has demanded both CBI and NIA to investigate the extra-judicial killing of three inmates by police in Chitrakoot prison of Uttar Pradesh.
The Court has also rejected the challenge made by one of the accused against cancellation of his bail by the trial Court while stating that he had played a pivotal role in the alleged conspiracy.
The reasons assigned by the High Court are apparently traceable back to Article 21 of the Constitution, of course without addressing the statutory embargo created by Section 43D (5) of UAPA.
Sakib a B.Sc student at Kalyani University, West Bengal and Kamal a labourer working as a mason and driver and others were allegedly planning “anti-national/terrorist” activities at several locations in India.
The Supreme Court on Monday deferred the hearing of a batch of pleas seeking CBI and NIA probe into the investigation of the Palghar lynching case alleging bias in the present investigation by Maharashtra authorities.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned the hearing in a plea filed by Advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha seeking a CBI/NIA probe into the mysterious death of West Bengal BJP MLA Debendra Nath Ray, who was found hanging from a tree on July 13, 2020. He had termed it a political murder.
The Kerala High Court set aside the order passed by Special NIA Court Kochi granting bail to Thwaha Fasal, a journalism student, in a Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act...
The petitioner has sought liberty to withdraw petition to approach Supreme Court. A two-judge bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul & Talwant Singh of Delhi High Court has granted liberty to petitioner.