The Petitioner Nitin Singhvi, a resident of Raipur alleged that PWD is increasing the height of the roads by several feet by laying layers of the road.
The petitioner Mustafa MH says that after the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution, section 18 is hit by Article 22 (7) of the Constitution that did not apply to Jammu and Kashmir.
The petitioner states that the arrangement of marriage garden should be within the garden, but the same is not done. Also visitors park Garden park vehicles on the road and service road that causes a jam situation.
Borwankar further contended that the access to an advocate’s personal and professional digital devices is a grave and egregious violation of privacy of a private citizen and that of a member of the Bar, who is engaged to act for his client.
Senior Advocate Lal Bahadur Khowal has filed a PIL in the Punjab and Haryana High Court challenging the notification issued by the Haryana government on January 29
A Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking arrest of Srilankan Naval Personals who allegedly killed 4 Indian Fishermen on January 18 this year.
The Allahabad High Court on Friday has imposed a cost of fifty thousand rupees on the petitioner for misusing the judicial process by filing a Public Interest Litigation for personal benefit.