The petitioner was not permitted to appear in the third-semester examination of the University allegedly on the ground that he has crossed the age of 35 years.
The petitioner is in no manner responsible for non-joining of Satye Singh Aswal at the transferred place, the Counsel for the petitioner submitted. According to him, the respondent-authority is not justified in passing the impugned order against the petitioner for a lapse committed by Satye Singh Aswal.