Madras High Court division bench asked counsel for the petitioner to refer to the document, where the order of court exists. It was stated that there exists no order of the court and thereby the statement of fact given in the representation in reference to the court's order became false.
Before taking up other issues for consideration, Tripura High Court division bench found it appropriate to examine the merits of the objections raised by the State counsel with regard to the locus standi of the petitioner in filing the writ petition as a public interest litigation.
The Delhi High Court division bench while hearing an appeal preferred by the TRAI stayed the operation of the order passed by bench where the Court refused to interfere the order of Central Information Commission directing regulatory body to furnish information related to the tapping of a lawyer’s phone.
The application is filed by Anjali Bhardwaj Bhardwaj, a senior transparency and accountability activist in the country, through Senior Counsel Prashant Bhushan.
Three central organisations, responsible for the app, have little knowledge about its creation and were issued show cause notices by the CIC, leading to privacy concerns of some 16.23 crore people who downloaded it.
The Prime Minister’s Office in stated that the PM CARES fund doesn’t come under the scope of "public authority" under the RTI Act, in response to RTI application filed seeking details on the fund