Supreme Court of India

The Delhi High Court bench issued a notice in the petition by an Advocate, who is affected by the said Rules. The matter is slated for September 13’ 2021.

When Covid was sweeping across India in 2020, the Supreme Court had refused permission to organise the world famous Jagannath Rath Yatra in Puri in view of crowding fears in the pandemic. The man accused in this case put out whatsapp message calling volunteers to attack CJI with shoes.

A single Judge bench of Allahabad High Court warned while hearing a Criminal Misc Bail Application filed by Jyoti that the virtual hearing is also a complete court proceeding and it should not be taken lightly,

The nation's children are a supremely important asset. Their nurture and solicitude are our responsibility. Children's programmes should find a prominent part in our national plans for the development of human resources, so that our children grow up to become robust citizens

The Delhi Tis Hazari Court relied on the order of the Supreme Court of India in the Suo Moto Writ Petition taking stock of the prevailing situation arising from unprecedented surge in and spiraling cases in the second wave of Covid-19 pandemic.

National Doctors Day–It is an underlying fact that the doctors and other medical/paramedical personnel have stood tall in front of the pandemic risking their own lives, and tirelessly worked to save the lives of their countrymen.

The Petitioners have moved the Supreme court considering the amendment being introduced as section V and section V-A under Part VI of Chapter II of the Bar Council of India Rules as shocking in how tyrannical they are.

The Supreme Court today issued notice in a petition filed by the Association of NCTE Approved Colleges Trust against the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) seeking an extension of cut-off dates for grant of recognition and affiliation for 2021-22, fixed in Supreme Court Case Maa Vaishno Devi Mahila Mahavidyalaya vs. State of U.P & Ors.

The letter sought to bring it to the notice of the Supreme Court of India of the misuse of Section 498A, which has the power to deal with the peril of cruelty and doldrums a married woman faces in the form of dowry demands, which in many a case has led to the demise of the woman.

N.K.Subramanian, counsel for the appellant, submitted that the wife was suffering from an incurable unsoundness of mind and mental disorder prior to marriage and consent to marriage was obtained by suppressing the fact.