The petitioner noted that the ban on surrogacy for unmarried women violates her right to reproduction, right to start a family, right to meaningful family life and right to privacy.
The Kerala High Court had noted that the material on record appears to support the allegation that the complaint was filed because the complainant was aggrieved that she did not receive sufficient compensation during divorce proceedings.
CJI D.Y Chandrachud noted that at times social activists are pushed by some business interest, adding that some other person who is directly aggrieved can approach the court and ask to frame rules for the aggregators.