Thursday, June 19, 2025
154,225FansLike
654,155FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

TAG

uttarakhand high court

Uttarakhand High Court di...

Uttarakhand High Court division bench while perusing the RTI application noted that in spite of providing the names of the persons to the petitioner, he has not arrayed them as party respondents.

Central Government notifi...

The elevation of five ne...

Uttarakhand High Court di...

While considering the PIL ,Uttarakhand High Court division bench noted from the record that though the petitioner said that he has received several complaints from different individuals of Pithoragarh and Almora but not a single complaint has been filed in the Petition.

Uttarakhand HC directs pe...

The Uttarakhand High Cou...

Uttarakhand High Court di...

The Uttarakhand High Cou...

Uttarakhand High Court di...

The Uttarakhand High Cou...

Uttarakhand High Court di...

It is brought to the notice of the Uttarakhand High Court that such a permission /license to operate a stone crusher was granted to the private respondent for a period of five years. After completion of the lease period of five years, the lease was again extended for a further ten years.

Supreme Court: 51 Former ...

The Supreme Court of Ind...

SC Collegium recommends t...

The Supreme Court colleg...

Uttarakhand High Court di...

According to the PIL filed in Uttarakhand High Court, a road is proposed to be constructed between Village Kandakhanikhal to Village Judd. Petitioner wants that road to pass through his village, i.e. Juyalgaon.

News Update

- Advertisement -